🔗 Share this article

Turns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering the team's most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach came at the executive and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation & Ideology

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

The Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or fails of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach and then fire him for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then discard them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.