🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear talks with the United States provided that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared new appeals had been made by mediators to resume discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet permit the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Course

Araghchi is treading a challenging route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more resilient in military terms and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium domestically that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Previous Discussions Unexpectedly Concluded

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the facilities had been destroyed. Subsequently, European countries exercised their right to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Officials claimed three times they had achieved a deal with the US representative the US official only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Iran's diplomats said the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if talks restart.

The US president recently claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to resume discussions, but privately Tehran representatives say they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Position

In his address to the conference, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the idea of international law, Araghchi said the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the strikes started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with total Washington understanding and coordination, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the European states that had always attempted to enforce their demands during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the final answer to resolve conflicts, but its standards, regulations and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will receive a response in the equivalent tone."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We acquired many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He added: "We successfully passed this war. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to break. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more united, and more endorsing of the government and the country in the aftermath of this attack."